图书介绍
菲律宾所提南海仲裁案 仲裁庭的裁决没有法律效力PDF|Epub|txt|kindle电子书版本下载
- 中国国际法学会 著
- 出版社： 北京：法律出版社
- ISBN：9787511896810
- 出版时间：2016
- 标注页数：110页
- 文件大小：12MB
- 文件页数：116页
- 主题词：南海－主权－国际仲裁－法律效力－研究
PDF下载
下载说明
菲律宾所提南海仲裁案 仲裁庭的裁决没有法律效力PDF格式电子书版下载
下载的文件为RAR压缩包。需要使用解压软件进行解压得到PDF格式图书。建议使用BT下载工具Free Download Manager进行下载,简称FDM(免费,没有广告,支持多平台）。本站资源全部打包为BT种子。所以需要使用专业的BT下载软件进行下载。如BitComet qBittorrent uTorrent等BT下载工具。迅雷目前由于本站不是热门资源。不推荐使用！后期资源热门了。安装了迅雷也可以迅雷进行下载！
（文件页数 要大于 标注页数，上中下等多册电子书除外）
注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具
图书目录
菲律宾所提南海仲裁案仲裁庭的裁决没有法律效力1
一仲裁庭错误认定菲律宾所提诉求构成中菲两国有关《公约》解释或适用的争端2
二仲裁庭管辖本质上属于领土主权问题的事项，超出了《公约》授权8
三仲裁庭罔顾中菲之间存在海域划界的事实，曲解《公约》第298条规定，越权管辖与海域划界有关的事项17
四仲裁庭否定中菲两国存在通过谈判解决相关争端的协议，曲解《公约》第281条规定，错误行使管辖权24
五仲裁庭错误裁定菲律宾就所提仲裁事项的争端解决方式履行了“交换意见”的义务29
六仲裁庭有违客观公正，背离了《公约》争端解决机制的目的和宗旨，破坏了《公约》的完整性和权威性31
菲律宾所提南海仲裁案仲裁庭的裁决没有法律效力（内容概要）38
The Tribunal' s Award in the “South China Sea Arbitration”Initiated by the Philippines Is Null and Void46
Ⅰ The Arbitral Tribunal errs in finding that the claims made by the Philippines constitute disputes between China and the Philippines concerning the interpretation or application of the UNCLOS48
Ⅱ By exercising jurisdiction over subject-matters about terri-torial sovereignty in essence， the Arbitral Tribunal acts ultra vires， beyond the authorization of the UNCLOS57
Ⅲ The Arbitral Tribunal disregards the fact that there exists an issue of maritime delimitation between China and the Philippines， distorts Article 298 of the UNCLOS， and acts ultra vires to exercise jurisdiction over claims concerning maritime delimitation70
Ⅳ The Arbitral Tribunal disregards the fact that there exist between China and the Philippines agreements to settle the relevant disputes through negotiation， distorts Article 281 of the UNCLOS， and erroneously exercises jurisdiction over the claims79
Ⅴ The Arbitral Tribunal errs in finding that the Philippines had fulfilled the obligation to “exchange views” regarding the means of disputes settlement with respect to the claims it made86
Ⅵ The Arbitral Tribunal is neither objective nor impartial， and its Award deviates from the object and purpose of the dispute settlement mechanism of the UNCLOS and impairs the integrity and authority of the Convention90
The Tribunal' s Award in the “South China Sea Arbitration”Initiated by the Philippines Is Null and Void （ExecutiveSummary）99