THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW SECOND EDITIONPDF|Epub|txt|kindle电子书版本下载

THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW SECOND EDITIONPDF格式电子书版下载

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

INTRODUCTION1

1.General1

2.Historical Origin of Hot Pursuit4

Part one THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT ON LAND11

1.General-International Treaties11

2.The United States-Mexican Border Incidents13

3.Communist Aggression Against Greece(1946-1949)17

4.The Korean Conflict(1950-1953)17

5.The Hungarian-Austrian Border Incidents(1956-1957).20

6.The Algerian War of Independence20

7.The Israeli-Jordanian Border Incident of November 13,196622

8.The Israeli-Jordanian Border Incident of April 8,196823

9.The Question of the Mercenaries and the Democratic Republic of Congo(1967-1968)26

10.The present Vietnam Conflict27

Part two THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT IN THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE SEA39

INTRODUCTORY39

A.LEGAL CONCEPT AND SOURCES42

CHAPTER Ⅰ.LEGAL CONCEPT42

CHAPTER Ⅱ.SOURCES46

Section Ⅰ.Codification-International Treaties46

Codification Efforts46

1.Private Codification Efforts46

2.Official Codification Efforts48

a) The Hague Codification Conference49

b) The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea54

International Treaties57

1.Multilateral Treaties57

a) Convention for the Suppression of the Contraband Traffic in Alcoholic Liquors57

b) Treaty on International Penal Law58

2.Bilateral Treaties59

Section Ⅱ.Select Case-Law62

I.International Arbitral Awards63

a) The I'm Alone case63

b) The Itata case68

c) Arbitral Awards by Asser69

Ⅱ.Judgments Rendered by Municipal Courts71

1.Cases Connected With the Theory of Constructive Presence71

Simple Constructive Presence71

a) The Araunah case71

b) The Tenyu Maru case71

c) The Grace and Ruby case73

Extensive Constructive Presence74

a) The Henry L.Marshall case74

b) The Marion L.Mosher case76

c) The Marjorie E.Bachman and other cases78

2.Other Cases of Hot Pursuit79

Hot Pursuit Commencing in Territorial Waters79

a) The North case79

b) The Ernest and Prosper Everaert case and others.81

c) The Fudge v.The King case83

Hot Pursuit Commencing Within a Limit Set Up For Certain Particular Purposes by a Treaty or Unilaterally84

a) The Vinces case84

b) The Newton Bay case85

c) The Katina case87

d) The Onassis case and others89

e) The Incidents of the Tonkin Gulf of 196491

Section Ⅲ.National Legislation93

1.American Continent94

a) The United States of America94

b) Canada101

c) Colombia103

2.Europe103

a) The United Kingdom103

b) The U.S.S.R107

c) Belgium109

d) Yugoslavia109

e) Bulgaria110

f) Greece110

g) Denmark110

3.African Continent111

a) Egypt111

4.Asia112

a) Israel112

b) China112

c) Ceylon113

d) Turkey114

e) South Vietnam115

5.Oceania116

a) New Zealand116

Section Ⅳ.The Teachings of Publicists118

Ⅰ.Authors Accepting the Right of Hot Pursuit119

Ⅱ.Authors Accepting the Right of Hot Pursuit only Under Certain Strict Conditions125

Ⅲ.Authors Against the Right of Hot Pursuit126

B.ANALYSIS OF THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT129

CHAPTER Ⅲ.PREREQUISITES OF THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT129

Section I.Acts and Offences Giving Right to Hot Pursuit129

1.The Nature of Acts and Offences Entitling the Coastal State to Hot Pursuit129

2.Seriousness of the Offence135

a) General135

b) Hot Pursuit Arising out of Oil Pollution or the Release of Radioactive Waste137

3.Acts and Offences Entitling Coastal States to Hot Pursuit During Innocent Passage141

a) Lateral Passage141

i.Criminal Jurisdiction of the Coastal State146

ii.Civil Jurisdiction of the Coastal State150

b) Vertical Passage151

4.Is Hot Pursuit Permitted in Case of an Attempted Offence,of Suspicion,or in Case of an Offence Committed by Negligence?154

Section Ⅱ.The Area of Hot Pursuit158

1.Hot Pursuit Starting in the Internal Waters,Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone of the Coastal State158

2.Hot Pursuit Starting from Within Adjacent Zones-Other than the Contiguous Zone-Established for Certain Special Purposes167

a) The Question of Hot Pursuit Starting on the Continental Shelf167

b) The Question of Hot Pursuit Starting in Adjacent Zones Established for Fishing or Conservation Purposes177

3.The Outer Limit of Hot Pursuit187

Section Ⅲ.Craft Entitled to the Right of Hot Pursuit192

Section Ⅳ.Position of the Vessels and other Prerequisites for the Commencement of Hot Pursuit198

1.Simultaneous Presence of the Vessels in the Same Zone198

2.Location of the Infringing Vessel199

3.The Signal to Stop204

CHAPTER Ⅳ.PROCEDURE OF HOT PURSUIT208

Section I.Immediate Commencement and Non-Interruption of Hot Pursuit208

1.Immediacy of Hot Pursuit208

2.Continuity of Hot Pursuit210

Section Ⅱ.Hot Pursuit of an Infringing Vessel by Aircraft215

Section Ⅲ.Hot Pursuit by Relays223

Section Ⅳ.Conclusion of Hot Pursuit227

1.Cessation of Hot Pursuit227

2.May Hot Pursuit Be Resumed After Cessation?229

3.Termination of Hot Pursuit233

4.Notification to the Flag State237

C.SOME PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT239

CHAPTER Ⅴ.ESCORT OF AN ARRESTED VESSEL ACROSS THE HIGH SEAS239

CHAPTER Ⅵ.THE DOCTRINE OF CONSTRUCTIVE PRESENCE243

CHAPTER Ⅶ.INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT252

1.General252

2.Legal Basis of State Responsibility Arising out of Hot Pursuit255

3.Circumstances Involving the Responsibility of the Coastal State in the Event of a Hot Pursuit257

4.Conditions for Espousing a Claim Arising out of an Unjustified Hot Pursuit259

a) General259

b) Nationality of Claims260

c) The Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies262

d) The Doctrine of Clean Hands264

5.Legal Consequences of State Responsibility264

6.A Possible Compulsory Settlement of Disputes Arising out of Hot Pursuit266

Part Three THE RIGHT OF HOT PURSUIT IN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW271

CHAPTER Ⅰ.GENERAL-LEGAL CONCEPT271

CHAPTER Ⅱ.SOURCES283

Section Ⅰ.National Legislation283

1.European Continent284

a) Greece284

b) The U.S.S.R287

c) Bulgaria290

2.American Continent291

a) The United States of America291

b) Colombia293

3.Asia294

a) Ceylon294

4.African Continent295

a) Egypt295

5.Oceania296

a) Australia296

Section Ⅱ.International Treaties298

1.The Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea(1958)298

2.The Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation(1944)305

Section Ⅲ.State Practice313

Ⅰ.State Practice During the Period of the Cold War314

1.Aerial Incidents Before the I.C.J314

a) Aerial Incident of October 7,1952316

b) Aerial Incident of September 4,1954318

c) Aerial Incident of November 7,1954320

d) Aerial Incident of March 10,1953321

2.Aerial Incidents Before the Security Council of the United Nations322

a) Aerial Incident of July 1,1960323

3.Aerial Incidents Which Resulted in Only an Exchange of Diplomatic Notes325

a) Aerial Incident of February 16,1953325

b) Aerial Incident of June 23,1959326

c) Aerial Incident of February 1963328

Ⅱ.State Practice During Armed Conflicts Not Amounting to War329

1.The Korean Conflict(1950-1953)331

2.The Present Vietnam Conflict333

CHAPTER Ⅲ.THE AREA OF AERIAL HOT PURSUIT339

CONCLUSION346

1.The Three Dimensions of the Right of Hot Pursuit in International Law346

2.The Right of Hot Pursuit as an Institution to Serve International Legal Order347

3.The Right of Hot Pursuit in Future.Proposals350

BIBLIOGRAPHY353

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS381

TABLE OF CASES389

INDEX395